Coverage at NY Times, front page today and my input to that piece To view or add a comment, sign in Pseudoscience So heres the whole story on why the FDA is endorsing peptides where there is a lack of solid scientific evidence that they have any effect eg on inflammation, weight loss, longeivity Essentially they added 6 people to the decision making committee who had a specific interests in supporting the sale of these peptides
doi: 10.1007/s11523-017-0514-5 164 LarssonSCCarterPVithayathilMKarSMasonAMBurgessS
In the meantime, some compounding pharmacies are trying to work around the bans by tweaking their recipes, such as by adding additional ingredients like vitamin B12
Conditions like obesity with diabetes, sleep apnea, or hypertension call for evidencebased medical care rather than a supplement experiment
Autoantibodies to low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 in myasthenia gravis
Genes were synthesised by Eurofins Genomics (Wolverhampton, UK) with 15 bp homology arms to the 5 and 3 end of the F11 or B8 insertion loci